The Bartels Reefing Furler – D. Barker, Sep. 2008Genoa Furling and ReefingMany
Wayfarer sailors have recognized the potential advantages of jib/genoa
furling systems, and some have taken the further step of investing in
reefing furler systems. (The principal difference between the two is a
reefing spar fitted at the luff (leading edge) of the sail.)
Typically
a purely furling system enables the sail to be used either fully
unfurled or fully furled ('on' or 'off'). Anything in between risks
having the upper part of the genoa unfurl in the breeze, which would be
disconcerting and potentially dangerous. By contrast the reefing
system allows any fraction of the sail (or all of it) to be furled away
('continuously variable'), with the spar preventing the upper part of
the sail from unfurling. This means that within seconds a single sail
can be reduced in area from a full genoa to the equivalent of a jib, or
even a storm jib, or nothing at all, and anything in between. For
owners without a full set of cruising sails this could represent a
significant financial saving compared to the cost of buying separate
genoa, jib etc., partially offsetting the initial cost of the reefing
system.
The Bartels systemOne particular reefing system is that made by the German firm Bartels (
www.bartelsgmbh.de),
which a number of Wayfarer sailors (including me) have now purchased.
There have been sufficient enquiries made to existing owners about this
to suggest that a short article about the Bartels system might be of
interest and would perhaps answer some of the questions that
prospective new owners might have. I make no apology for straying
occasionally from analysis to opinion, as this article has been written
based on my experience over the past two seasons as an owner.
Let us first examine the various components of the system:-


This
is a high quality component, made entirely from stainless steel. It is
almost completely enclosed, so there is no risk of loose turns from the
furling line dropping out and becoming tangled. (Arguably riding turns
could be hidden within the drum and therefore be more difficult to
untangle than with some of the cage-type drums; in practice I have
never known this to happen.) The bearings seem to be of high quality,
and the variant supplied for Wayfarers has a “collapse load” of 20kN or
about 2 tonnes. Apparently Bartels feel that the bearings run more
smoothly under loading, but they seem fine even without. It may be
worth mentioning that this furling drum could be used in a non-reefing
furling system, perhaps with a view to upgrading to full reefing in
future (when your sails eventually need to be replaced, for example.)
The
drum is attached to the bow fitting by a clevis pin. The exact
arrangement depends upon the type of bow fitting. Mine is the two-part
channel type; I have added a (modified) shroud adjuster (see photo) to
extend the range of possible attachment points for the furling drum as
well as the painter. There is an additional component available from
the manufacturer which raises the drum above the bow fitting
(bracketed, see photo), but on advice I decided to dispense with this,
as the tack of the sail needs to be kept as low as possible. In my
experience, without the extra part there is just enough room between
the sides of the bow fitting to allow the drum to be attached, and just
enough clearance above the deck to allow the drum to tilt to the
correct angle, but not enough clearance for the mast to be lowered with
the spar in situ.